JOURNAL ARTICLEOpen AccessJournal of Sustainable Finance & Banking

Pricing Sustainable Debt: Credit Spreads and Green Bond Premiums in European Secondary Markets

schoolProf. Eleanor Vance(Director & Chair in Sustainable Enterprise)
schoolDr. Marcus Thorne(Senior Research Fellow in SME Industrial Systems)
Published: 2025
Volume: 18
Issue: 4
Pages: 412-448

Scholarly Abstract

We examine secondary market transactions of 3,400 corporate debt securities issued across European exchanges between 2020 and 2025. Applying propensity score matching and firm-level fixed effects, we isolate a statistically significant green premium of 4.2 basis points for investment-grade issuers with verified third-party taxonomy alignment. However, this premium dissipates entirely among issuers exhibiting substantial ESG rating divergence across major rating providers, suggesting investor skepticism toward ambiguous sustainability disclosures.

Sustainable FinanceGreen BondsCredit SpreadsDebt Capital MarketsESG Rating Divergence

Standard Academic Citation

Cite this scholarly manuscript using official bibliographic conventions

Prof. Eleanor Vance, Dr. Marcus Thorne (2025). Pricing Sustainable Debt: Credit Spreads and Green Bond Premiums in European Secondary Markets. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Banking, CISR-WP-2025-04, pp. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsf/2025.042
auto_storiesOnline Scholarly Document ReaderOpen Access
Page 1 of 38
CISR Working Paper Series — WP-2026-04ISSN 2753-9128

Pricing Sustainable Debt: Credit Spreads and Green Bond Premiums in European Secondary Markets

Peer-Reviewed Working Paper • Section 1

1. Institutional Background and SME Asymmetries
Small and medium-sized enterprises constitute over 98% of business enterprises within Northern European industrial supply chains and account for more than 60% of manufacturing value added. However, academic frameworks regarding circular business models (CBMs) have predominantly derived empirical grounding from diversified multinational enterprises.

Unlike global conglomerates equipped with dedicated sustainability accounting divisions, SMEs face structural barriers including high initial capital expenditure requirements, scarce access to reverse supply chain infrastructure, and uncertain residual asset valuation under conventional bank lending covenants.

2. Empirical Field Audit Methodology
To overcome self-reporting biases prevalent in cross-sectional survey research, this inquiry executed 18 longitudinal on-site facility audits across automated manufacturing plants in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Primary observations focused on material sorting throughput, closed-loop polymer recycling yields, and energy consumption metrics during reverse assembly runs.

Centre for Innovation and Sustainability Research (CISR)Page 1 of 38

References & Bibliographical Citations

4 Records
[1]
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy”. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 308–320.
[2]
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 757–768.
[3]
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations”. Ecological Economics, vol. 143, no. C, pp. 37–46.
[4]
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities”. Long Range Planning, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40–49.