scienceACTIVE RESEARCH STUDY

Circular Business Models in Manufacturing SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Northern Europe

A multi-year investigation into institutional conditions, capital allocation, and reverse logistics in 142 manufacturing SMEs.

Funding & GovernanceNorthern European Enterprise Innovation Grant & Institutional Research Fund
account_balance

Research Context & Scope

While circular economic paradigms have been broadly examined in multinational conglomerates, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face distinct resource constraints, structural rigidities, and asymmetric capital barriers. This project explores the organizational capabilities, reverse supply chain partnerships, and policy conditions required for manufacturing SMEs to transition towards closed-loop models. Based on 142 survey participants and 18 facility audits across Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Objectives & Empirical Hypotheses

Primary Objectives
  • Document financial barriers preventing circular capital expenditure in SMEs.
  • Evaluate institutional frictions in national waste taxonomy legislation.
  • Develop an actionable 4-phase circular transition archetype for enterprise management.
  • Formulate three policy directives for European industrial decarbonisation frameworks.
Guiding Research Questions
  • How do SME owners evaluate payback periods for circular remanufacturing equipment?
  • What reverse logistics mechanisms provide economically viable material recovery at regional scale?
  • Which regulatory conditions accelerate cross-firm industrial symbiosis?

Methodology & Empirical Architecture

Mixed-methods research architecture combining cross-sectional survey sampling (N=142) with longitudinal on-site facility audits (N=18) and qualitative executive interviews across Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.

Field Protocol & PhasingYear 1: Field audits and survey distribution. Year 2: Econometric analysis and reverse logistics mapping. Year 3: Policy dissemination and executive workshop series.

Key Empirical Findingsinsights

01

While 68% of surveyed firms maintain strategic intent toward product remanufacturing, fewer than 22% have embedded circular performance metrics into capital expenditure authorizations.

02

Mid-market manufacturers face average payback horizons of 4.8 years on sorting equipment, exceeding conventional commercial lending terms.

03

Cross-tier reverse supply chain transparency and shared municipal processing hubs reduce transport overhead by 34% compared to bilateral recovery.

Policy Directives & Enterprise Outcomespolicy

check_circleAdoption of the CISR 4-Phase Transition Archetype by 24 regional manufacturing federations.
check_circleDirect contribution to European Commission DG GROW policy guidance on industrial waste taxonomy harmonization.
check_circleOpen-source release of anonymized microdata for secondary academic modeling.

Research Documents & Open Datasetsdownload_for_offline

picture_as_pdf

Full Empirical Research Dossier & Field Survey Instrument

PDF842 KB
downloadDownload
picture_as_pdf

Executive Summary & 4-Phase Implementation Guidebook

PDF320 KB
downloadDownload

Scholarly Outputs & Papers

All Publications →
Open Access • CC BY 4.0Sustainability & Responsible BusinessWORKING PAPER

Circular Business Models in Manufacturing SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Northern Europe

Prof. Eleanor Vance, Dr. Marcus ThornePublished 2026CISR Working Paper Series

While circular economic paradigms have been broadly studied within multinational corporations, small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face distinct resource asymmetries, structural rigidities, and capital constraints when operationalizing circularity. This study investigates the institutional conditions, organizational capabilities, and technology integration mechanisms required for manufacturing SMEs to transition successfully toward closed-loop industrial ecosystems. Employing an empirical mixed-methods design, we examine survey data from 142 enterprise owners and executive directors across Sweden, Denmark, and Finland, triangulated with 18 in-depth qualitative field audits of advanced manufacturing facilities conducted between 2023 and 2025. Our findings reveal that while 68% of surveyed firms maintain strategic intent toward product remanufacturing and material recovery, fewer than 22% have embedded circular performance metrics into their capital expenditure authorizations or supplier appraisal frameworks. We identify cross-tier reverse supply chain transparency, digital product passport infrastructure, and collaborative multi-stakeholder municipal hubs as paramount determinants for commercial viability. Conversely, regulatory friction in waste taxonomy classification persists as the primary institutional impediment across Nordic jurisdictions. We conclude by presenting an actionable 4-phase circular transition archetype for enterprise management alongside 3 policy directives for European industrial decarbonization frameworks.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.01.024