Open Access — CC BY 4.0Peer-Reviewed Working PaperCISR-WP-2025-04

Dynamic Capabilities in Industrial Decarbonisation: Strategic Management Society Annual Conference

schoolDr. Ahsan Rahman(Director)
schoolDr. Farzana Ahmed(Senior Research Fellow)
calendar_todayPublished March 2026
menu_bookWorking Paper No. CISR-WP-2025-04
Executive AbstractScholarly Overview

Presented at the Strategic Management Society (SMS) Annual Conference, this empirical paper examines the organizational routines and dynamic capabilities enabling capital redeployment toward low-carbon technologies. Drawing upon longitudinal field observations of 24 manufacturing enterprises, we identify three core managerial microfoundations.

Controlled Vocabulary / Indexing Keywords
Dynamic CapabilitiesStrategic Management SocietyDecarbonisationIndustrial Strategy

Standard Academic Citation

Cite this scholarly manuscript using official bibliographic conventions

Dr. Ahsan Rahman, Dr. Farzana Ahmed (2025). Dynamic Capabilities in Industrial Decarbonisation: Strategic Management Society Annual Conference. Strategic Management Society (SMS) Conference Proceedings, CISR-WP-2025-04, pp. 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238471.001.0001
auto_storiesOnline Scholarly Document ReaderOpen Access
Page 1 of 38
CISR Working Paper Series — WP-2026-04ISSN 2753-9128

Dynamic Capabilities in Industrial Decarbonisation: Strategic Management Society Annual Conference

Peer-Reviewed Working Paper • Section 1

1. Institutional Background and SME Asymmetries
Small and medium-sized enterprises constitute over 98% of business enterprises within Northern European industrial supply chains and account for more than 60% of manufacturing value added. However, academic frameworks regarding circular business models (CBMs) have predominantly derived empirical grounding from diversified multinational enterprises.

Unlike global conglomerates equipped with dedicated sustainability accounting divisions, SMEs face structural barriers including high initial capital expenditure requirements, scarce access to reverse supply chain infrastructure, and uncertain residual asset valuation under conventional bank lending covenants.

2. Empirical Field Audit Methodology
To overcome self-reporting biases prevalent in cross-sectional survey research, this inquiry executed 18 longitudinal on-site facility audits across automated manufacturing plants in Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Primary observations focused on material sorting throughput, closed-loop polymer recycling yields, and energy consumption metrics during reverse assembly runs.

Centre for Innovation and Sustainability Research (CISR)Page 1 of 38

Scholarly References

4 Indexed Citations
[1]
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy”. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 308–320.
[2]
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?”. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 757–768.
[3]
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations”. Ecological Economics, vol. 143, no. C, pp. 37–46.
[4]
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities”. Long Range Planning, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 40–49.